Whether you're pro- or anti-death penalty, you have to admit that George Bush saying he'd like to see Saddam paying the "ultimate penalty" is going to ruffle some feathers.
I am personally against the death penalty, but I wouldn't have wasted any tears had Saddam been killed while resisting arrest. I was glad to see that Saddam had not gone down guns blazing; for a while at least the Islamists were denied a martyr figure.
I'll be interested to see how this develops. Just last night on the BBC I was watching Jeremy Paxman interview two Muslim women activists, one in the UK and one in the US. Both of them expressed something that wouldn't have occurred to me: the Arab world (they couldn't speak for the rest of the Islamic world) was reacting with anger to the undignified way that Saddam was put on display after his arrest, viewing it as an American affront to "uppity Arabs", reminding them that even their leaders could be humiliated by the Americans at any time or place. Personally that was a new slant for me; I thought showing Saddam in such circumstances was a good way to stick a pin in any bubble of myth that was growing around Saddam amongst the Iraqi resistance - Your Mythic Leader in Absentia is now the latest perp on the Baghdad edition of COPS.
Would it be better for Saddam to rot in jail till the end of time? Or would it be better to let the Iraqi people have their revenge? Now that Dubya has weighed in with his preference and said that he'd be happy to see Saddam dead (not exactly a new idea, to be sure) can there be any doubt that any Iraqi-led trial and judgment resulting in Saddam's presumably public beheading / hanging / whatever would be seen as a thinly disguised long arm of American retribution? Will that, in the end, make him a martyr?
Recent Comments